Rekonstrukce oligocenniho prostredi na severnim okraji stredohorskeho vulkanickeho komplexu – kombinace vulkanologie a paleontologie

Fossilised remains of plants and animals can be found at many sites of volcaniclastic deposits and intravolcanic sediments (limestones, diatomites, lignite) of the České středohoří Volcanic Complex. Many of these localities have been known and studied since the 19th century. Some of these localities even gained international recognition due to abnormal abundance of fossil material. Collected and carefully stored paleontological material is still intensively studied with an aim to better understand the evolution of life but also environmental changes in Central Europe during Cenozoic. Combination of paleontology and volcanology has a potential to better constrain the paleo-environmental interpretations, as the two geological branches use different methods and gathered results can be confirmed by independent techniques. For this reason, our research focused on less-known paleontological locality at Starý Šachov, which provides interesting exposure documenting relations between volcanic activity, surrounding environment and biosphere during early stage of the České středohoří Volcanic Complex formation.

The site Starý Šachov, also referred to as Malý Šachov (Radoň 2001), belongs to the basanitic Lower Oligocene Ústí Fm. of the České středohoří Volcanic Complex (sensu Cajz 2000) and is located at the northern margin of the České středohoří Mts. (Fig 1a). The Starý Šachov gorge exposes a sequence of pyroclastic rocks, capped with basanite lava (Fig. 1b), which was dated to 30.70 ± 0.45 Ma (K-Ar, bulk-rock). The pyroclastic sequence overlays redeposited volcaniclastic and intravolcanic sedimentary rocks (Fig. 1c). The volcaniclastic layers in the lower part of the sequence, where they alternate with intravolcanic sediments, consist of a mixture of basaltic epiclasts, and redeposited pyroclasts mixed with quartz and K-feldspar grains (Fig. 2a). This association suggests a short fluvial transport of volcaniclastic material from the growing volcanic complex, mixed with clastic material of the poorly solidified Merboltice Fm. sandstones representing the intimate bedrock of the locality. The pyroclastic sequence starts with deposits dominated by glassy non-vesiculated lapilli (Figs 1e and 2b, c) later replaced by deposits dominated by highly vesiculated lapilli (Figs 1d and 2d).

The light-coloured sediments from the lower part of the succession contain abundant paleontological material. Clusters of white strongly flattened and crushed mollusc shells (Figs 3a, d, f, g) occur in whitish to light grey thinly bedded claystones. Together with molluscs, small cracked ostracod shells (Figs 4a–c) and caddisfly (Trichoptera) larval cases (Figs 4e, f) are very abundant. Very rarely, twigs of plants from the Taxodiaceae family (Radoň 2001) and indeterminable leaf fragments were found. In dark coaly clays, undercut ostracod valves are abundant as well as in light coloured clays. Small rounded seeds of water lily-like plants (Fig. 4h) and fragments of frog bones (Fig. 4i) occur in larger numbers in the coaly clays. Gyrogonites of charophytes (Figs 4d, g) and only three shells of freshwater gastropods were found in the redeposited volcaniclastic layer underlaying the light clays. Unlike the compressed and crushed gastropod shells of the overlying clays, these three shells are spatially preserved. They belong to the species Planorbarius blazkai (Klika 1891) and Stagnicola sp.

Based on the described taphocenosis, sedimentary and pyroclastic deposits we may reconstruct the paleoenvironment of this locality in Early Oligocene (Fig. 5). The landscape prior to the volcanic activity can be characterized as alluvial plain on the northern periphery of a growing volcanic complex. In this plain, braiding rivers were transporting and depositing volcaniclastic material as well as quartz grains of the poorly solidified Merboltice Fm. sandstones. Numerous oxbow lakes from abandoned meanders represented static water bodies.

References

Benkó, Zs. – Nagy, D. – Jáger, V. – Szepesi, J. – Pécskay, Z. – Ott, U. – Kocsisné Pető, M. (2017): A Cassignol-Gillot módszer bevezetése az ATOMKI IKER központjában. Ahol az elemek találkoznak: víz. föld és tűz határán: 8. Kőzettani és Geokémiai Vándorgyűlés. – Szihalom. Magyarország.

Cajz, V. (2000): Proposal of lithostratigraphy for the České středohoří Mts. volcanics. – Bull. Czech geol. Surv. 75, 7–16.

Dalrymple, G. B. – Lanphere, M. A. (1969): Potassium-argon dating. Principles, techniques and applications to geochronology. – 257 str. U.S. Geological Survey. W. H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco.

Dempírová, L. – Šikl, J. – Kašičková, R. – Zoulková, V. – Kříbek, B. (2010): The evaluation of precision and relative error of the main components of silicate analyses in Central Laboratory of the Czech Geological Survey. – Zpr. geol.Výzk. v Roce 2009, 43, 326–330. (in Czech with English summary)

Gillot, P. – Cornette, Y. (1986): The cassignol technique for potassium-argon dating precision and accuracy: Examples from the late pleistocene to recent volcanics from Southern Italy. – Chem. Geol. Isot. Geosci. Sect. 59, 205–222.

Harzhauser, M. – Neubauer, T. A. – Georgopoulou, E. – Harl, J. (2014): The Early Miocene (Burdigalian) mollusc fauna of the North Bohemian Lake (Most Basin). – Bull. Geosci. 89, 819–908.

Kafka, J. (1911): Studien im Gebiete der Tertiar-Formation Bohmens. – Arch. naturwiss. Landes-Durchforsch. Böhm. 14 (4), 1–91.

Klika, B. (1892): Měkkýši třetihorních usazenin sladkovodních v severozápadních Čechách. – Arch. přírodověd. Výzk. Čech 7 (4), 1–116.

Klika, G. (1891): Die tertiaren Land- und Suswasserconchylien des nordwestlichen Böhmen. – Arch. naturwiss. Landes-Durchforsch. Böhm. 7 (4), 1–122.

Kokelaar, B. P. (1983): The mechanism of Surtseyan volcanism. – J. Geol. Soc. 140, 939–944,

Kvaček, Z. (1989): Fosilní Tetraclinis Mast. (Cupressaceae). – J. Nat. Mus. (Prague), Natur. Hist. Ser. 155 (1–4), 45–53.

McPhie, J. – Doyle, M. – Allen, R. (1993): Volcanic textures, a guide to the interpretation of textures in volcanic rocks. 198 str. CODES. Univ. of Tasmania. Hobart.

MYSLIVEČK, J. - KOUTECKÝ, V. - RAPRICH, V. - SAKALA, J. - POUR, O. - LAUFEK, F. (2021): Zeolity mineralizovaná dřeva v laharu Soutěsky u Děčína. - Geosci. Res. Rep. 54, 77-06 View article

Prokop, J. (2003): Remarks on palaeoenviromental changes based on reviewed Tertiary insect associations from the Krušné hory piedmont basins and the České středohoří Mts. in northwestern Bohemia (Czech Republic). – Acta Zool. Cracov. (suppl. – Fossil Insects) 46, 329–344.

Prokop, J. – Fikáček, M. (2007): Early Oligocene insect fauna from Seifhennersdorf (Saxony, Germany). – Acta Mus. Nat. Pragae, Ser. B, Hist. Nat. 63(2–4), 205–213.

Radoň, M. (2001): Výzkum terciérních paleontologických lokalit v Českém středohoří. – 380 str. MS Záv. zpr. program. projektu MK ČR, Regionální muz. v Teplicích. Teplice.

Rapprich, V. – Godány, J. – Tasáryová, Z. – Levý, O. – Čech, J. (2013): Doklad erupcí surtseyského typu v rané fázi vývoje Českého středohoří. – Zpr. geol. Výzk. v Roce 2012, 64–67.

Reuss, A. E. (1861): Die fossilen Mollusken der tertiaren Susswasserkalke Bohmens. – Sitzunsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 42, 55–84.

Steiger, R. H. – Jäger E. J. (1977): Subcommission on geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology. – Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 36, 359–362.

Teodoridis, V. – Kvaček, Z. – Radoň, M. – Rapprich, V. – Bruch, A. A. (2020): A new Oligocene flora from Ludvíkovice near Děčín (České středohoří Mts., the Czech Republic). – Fossil Imprint 76, 297–314.

Wenz, W. (1917): Zur Altersfrage der böhmischen Suswasserkalke. – Jb. Nassau. Ver. Naturkde Wiesbaden 70, 39–83.